--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 21:24
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I think we can declare this as fixed and open a new bug about 128bit long
> double and soft fp.
And the new bug is PR 29541.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 21:19
---
I think we can declare this as fixed and open a new bug about 128bit long
double and soft fp.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #17 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-06-29 18:33 ---
PR28150 seems to be related.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 14:23 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 14:22:58 2006
New Revision: 110969
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110969
Log:
2006-02-14 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aldy
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 14:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 14:17:59 2006
New Revision: 110967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110967
Log:
2006-02-07 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Benja
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 08:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=10822)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10822&action=view)
gcc41-ldbl-default.patch
And this patch to enable long double by default when configured with
--with-long-double
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 08:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=10821)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10821&action=view)
gcc41-ldbl-default-libstdc++.patch
Just for completeness, I'm attaching backport of the libstdc++-v3 changes
tha
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 08:44 ---
I think the agreement is that the currently committed patches to gcc-4_1-branch
is all we want on that branch. GCC 4.1 will be able to build GLIBC 2.4 on
all architectures, for code not using libstdc++-v3 at all will
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-11 08:38 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Feb 11 08:38:51 2006
New Revision: 110872
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110872
Log:
PR target/25864
Backport from mainline
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 20:58 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 10 20:58:33 2006
New Revision: 110851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110851
Log:
PR target/25864
Backport from mainline
--- Comment #9 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 07:53 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Feb 3 07:52:57 2006
New Revision: 110539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110539
Log:
2006-02-03 Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 07:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Feb 3 07:44:12 2006
New Revision: 110538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110538
Log:
2006-02-03 Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 19:59 ---
Subject: Bug 25864
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 27 19:59:49 2006
New Revision: 110303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110303
Log:
2006-01-27 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 06:27
---
I think it's fine to change S390 for 4.1, if we change PowerPC. In fact, I
think S390 is less risk than PowerPC, since it is used by fewer people.
I'm watching the patches on the GCC list for PowerPC, but it look
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-24 16:26 ---
On the Linux architectures that use DFmode long double ATM and want to switch
to some other format in glibc 2.4 (best would be if all are switching
together),
we primarily need GCC 4.1 to actually be able to compile gl
--- Comment #4 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 23:19
---
FYI, the glibc folks have made a similar request w.r.t. adding
128-bit long double (IEEE quad) support for s390(x)-ibm-linux.
We're currently preparing a patch -- if there's still a chance
of getting this into 4.1
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 20:44
---
David has indicated to me that it's possible (but not certain) that the PowerPC
GNU/Linux community wants this on by default in GCC 4.1. Since we'd very much
like to avoid ABI changes throughout the 4.1 series, an
--- Comment #2 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 20:28 ---
This is an enhancement request in conjunction with Glibc.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 20:27 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
19 matches
Mail list logo
