[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:01 --- This is actually because the middle-end does not constant fold 128bit IBM long double. I am assuming you are using -mlong-double-128. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:02 --- Which is PR 19779. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:03 --- I'm not sure 1.0l/42 is a valid constant initializer. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:04 --- yes, full configure line: Target: powerpc64-suse-linux Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr --with-local-prefix=/usr/local --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man

[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:20 --- hmm, I guess I'm find with resolving this as duplicate to 19779, even though I don't understand why this is only an issue on PPC for me.. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26374

[Bug target/26374] Compile failure on long double

2006-02-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-19 22:24 --- (In reply to comment #5) hmm, I guess I'm find with resolving this as duplicate to 19779, even though I don't understand why this is only an issue on PPC for me.. It is because the long double format used on PPC