[Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options

2010-08-30 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-30 16:49 --- Let us know if there are any remaining issues, thanks. -- mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options

2010-03-19 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-03-19 23:42 --- Should this bug be closed? I don't every recall seeing it in recent history on i686-apple-darwin*. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26552

[Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options

2007-01-24 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options

2006-03-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 23:40 --- Here is the patch which should fix this bug: Index: i386.c === --- i386.c (revision 111688) +++ i386.c (working copy) @@ -2232,7 +2232,9 @@

[Bug target/26552] gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c fails on x86-darwin with default options

2006-03-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 23:51 --- After talking with Eric Christopher, this patch is going to be wrong when he removes the stubs for x86 as there will be a PLT now so I am not going to submit the patch and I am removing the missed-optimization. --