--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 12:04 ---
This testcase works with 4.3.4, 4.4.2 and 4.5.0.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 17:55 ---
The testcase in this PR works since GCC 4.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-16 10:54 ---
*** Bug 33791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-16 11:12 ---
*** Bug 33791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432
--- Comment #5 from master_up at post dot cz 2006-05-30 10:07 ---
Very similar result for gcc-4.1.1, is better create new BUG or is this message
suffcient?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27432
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 22:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 17:30 ---
This is the standard x86 vs 1st pass scheduling vs the register allocator bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
