[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

2018-02-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827 Bug 27827 depends on bug 27855, which changed state. Bug 27855 Summary: [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

2007-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #70 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 02:59 --- Fixed, 4.0 branch is now been closed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

2006-10-07 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #69 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-07 10:06 --- The linked-to patch is already on the trunk. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

2006-08-11 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #66 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-08-11 14:10 --- (on bugzilla because I had problems sending mail to you) Just got your most recent update. From what I can tell, you have applied your patch to the 4.1 series, so that the next 4.1 release will have the fix? Yes.

[Bug target/27827] [4.0 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3

2006-08-11 Thread whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
--- Comment #67 from whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu 2006-08-11 15:22 --- Uros, Slightly offtopic, but to put some numbers to comment #8 and comment #11, equivalent SSE code now reaches only 50% of x87 single performance and 60% of x87 double performance on AMD x86_64 FYI, you *may* get