[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

2018-02-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

2018-02-05 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #57 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 > > --- Comment #56 from Aldy Hernandez --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

2018-02-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #56 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #55) > Note the original report used -O and Aldhy used -O2 but we are talking > about a benchmark and when you use -ffast-math you also use -O3. Thanks, I will

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

2018-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 --- Comment #55 from Richard Biener --- I think the original report is about x87 math vs. SSE math. It's a bit hard to benchmark this through the releases given changes in tuning and vector feature sets (-march=native is out of the question).

[Bug target/27855] [6/7/8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

2018-02-01 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment