--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 09:57
---
What is the command line to run only one test in the libstdc++ testsuite?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-30 11:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
What is the command line to run only one test in the libstdc++ testsuite?
I'm reluctant to tell you in public, because certainly there are *far* better
ways, but was I usually do when I'm in a
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-30 11:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
... the complete command line from the ChangeLog.
Of course read it 'libstdc++.log', sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 12:02
---
I'm reluctant to tell you in public, because certainly there are *far* better
ways, but was I usually do when I'm in a hurry, I simply go inside the
libstdc++-v3/testsuite directory, set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-30 12:05 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The idea was precisely to avoid running the whole testsuite. :-)
Oh, well, once in a while you *must* di that, right? ;) Just save somewhere
libstdc++.log...
--
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 14:49
---
Oh, well, once in a while you *must* di that, right? ;)
Only under duress. :-) Bug confirmed with Binutils 2.17 20061003 on x86.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 14:50
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 00:02 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01768.html
Hmm, I bet this is really a binutils bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29639
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-30 00:08 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01768.html
Are you sure this *2004* patch is relevant?
Hmm, I bet this is really a binutils bug.
I'm seeing the problem with a stock 2.17, if
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 00:21 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01768.html
Are you sure this *2004* patch is relevant?
Yes since it just went in during the time frame you
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-30 00:27 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Are you sure this *2004* patch is relevant?
Yes since it just went in during the time frame you mentioned:
2006-10-28 Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crazy. Ok, thanks, let's add Eric
11 matches
Mail list logo
