--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 06:09 ---
Subject: Bug 30040
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 29 06:09:06 2006
New Revision: 120256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120256
Log:
2006-12-28 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backport from
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-19 17:15 ---
Subject: Bug 30040
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec 19 17:14:22 2006
New Revision: 120053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120053
Log:
Merged revisions 119412-119459 via svnmerge from
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-03 21:43 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I never said it was a regression and I opened it against gcc 4.2.0 if you
take a look.
So what if you opened it against 4.2. It is not a regression and by own normal
policy if it has been