--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 19:51
---
Subject: Bug 30634
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Feb 10 19:51:40 2007
New Revision: 121802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121802
Log:
PR target/30634
* pa.md (movdf): For 64-bit
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 19:54
---
Subject: Bug 30634
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Feb 10 19:54:33 2007
New Revision: 121803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121803
Log:
PR target/30634
* pa.md (movdf): For 64-bit
--- Comment #15 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 20:24
---
Fixed by patch on 4.2 and trunk.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
17:06 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
My patch just exposed a latent bug. Does this fail on the trunk also the same
way? If not can you trace to see where the
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 17:13 ---
Can you try the following C code?
double f(void)
{
long long t = -1;
double t1;
__builtin_memcpy(t1, t, sizeof(long long));
return t;
}
If the above is broken also, then my patch just exposed the above
--- Comment #10 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
17:37 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
Can you try the following C code?
double f(void)
{
long long t = -1;
double t1;
__builtin_memcpy(t1, t,
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
19:55 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
Can you try the following C code?
double f(void)
{
long long t = -1;
double t1;
__builtin_memcpy(t1, t,
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
23:31 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
Also I don't see anything wrong with the expand's RTL. The difference between
4.1.1 and 4.2's RTL is that we don't go
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
01:07 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 02:53 ---
A scan of libgfortran/ChangeLog and
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-04 01:41 ---
The failure was introduced in revision 121076:
My patch just exposed a latent bug. Does this fail on the trunk also the same
way? If not can you trace to see where the difference in the IR between the
4.2 branch
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-04
01:55 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
My patch just exposed a latent bug. Does this fail on the trunk also the same
way? If not can you trace to see where the
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-01-30
14:51 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 02:53 ---
A scan of libgfortran/ChangeLog and
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 01:16 ---
Maybe I'll finally get the details right:
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.00
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/gnu64/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-shared
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 01:20 ---
Test didn't fail at revision 121050.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30634
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 02:53 ---
A scan of libgfortran/ChangeLog and gcc/fortran/ChangeLog does not
reveal anything that would cause this failure. Can you identify
the exact commit that causes the problem? Perhaps, something got
mismerged from
15 matches
Mail list logo
