--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 10:25 ---
If there is a request to support a big endian default configuration for ARM,
there should be a separate enhancement request for that. Given this, I'd close
this bug as being invalid. I've filed PR39975 for this
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-19 21:59 ---
I believe this is a case of wrong usage of the compiler and this bug could be
closed as invalid. However the question remains about big endian and little
endian compiler options and supporting or not support armeb
--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2007-05-31 19:48 ---
I cannot reproduce this on an armv5b-softvfp-linux machine, with either
gcc-3.3.6, gcc-4.0.4, gcc-4.1.2, or gcc-4.2.0 (all bootstrapped natively on the
arm machine).
However, I suspect your test case is wrong. Unpatched
--- Comment #2 from bigfoot at private dot dk 2007-05-31 21:22 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
However, I suspect your test case is wrong. Unpatched versions of gcc default
to little-endian mode on arm, even if you configure with
--target=arm${foo}b-${bar}.
Since you didn't pass
