[Bug target/35079] [arm] ICE (segfault) with gfortran -O3 -funroll-loops

2012-01-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35079 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug target/35079] [arm] ICE (segfault) with gfortran -O3 -funroll-loops

2009-05-28 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-05-28 08:40 --- (In reply to comment #3) I just tried this with gfortran 4.3.3 that I have on my ubuntu box. I don't get a failure with arm-linux-gnueabi. Can you verify that this still exists with arm-linux configurations ? This

[Bug target/35079] [arm] ICE (segfault) with gfortran -O3 -funroll-loops

2009-05-27 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-27 13:01 --- I just tried this with gfortran 4.3.3 that I have on my ubuntu box. I don't get a failure with arm-linux-gnueabi. Can you verify that this still exists with arm-linux configurations ? Thanks. -- ramana at gcc

[Bug target/35079] [arm] ICE (segfault) with gfortran -O3 -funroll-loops

2008-03-21 Thread kmccarty at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 from kmccarty at debian dot org 2008-03-21 17:06 --- Hi gfortran developers, I can confirm that this ICE still happens on arm with gfortran 4.3 rc2 [*], and with the optimization reduced to -O2 (-funroll-loops -O1 is OK, as is -O3 without -funroll-loops). [*] This is on

[Bug target/35079] [arm] ICE (segfault) with gfortran -O3 -funroll-loops

2008-02-04 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2008-02-04 17:24 --- Created an attachment (id=15094) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15094action=view) code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35079