--- Comment #5 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-20 17:18 ---
Subject: Bug 38056
Author: sje
Date: Fri Feb 20 17:18:20 2009
New Revision: 144329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=144329
Log:
PR target/38056
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-02-20 17:20 ---
Fixed on mainline and 4.3 branch.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-13 21:59 ---
Subject: Bug 38056
Author: sje
Date: Fri Feb 13 21:59:32 2009
New Revision: 144168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=144168
Log:
PR target/38056
* config/ia64/ia64.c
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-02-11 19:04 ---
This behaviour changed with the patch to fix PR 10907 and I believe that GCC is
correct in not doing the tail call optimization. The optimization is not done
because ia64_function_ok_for_sibcall returns false and it
--- Comment #3 from jsworley at qwest dot net 2009-02-11 23:41 ---
Accepting Steve Ellcey's analysis, it would seem that the tail call *should* be
recognized when -mconstant-gp is specified; however, it isn't.
--
jsworley at qwest dot net changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 22:01 ---
Confirmed with r143992. The tail call is correctly identified in the
.final_cleanup dump, but not expanded to a tail call.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
