https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Wi
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570
--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-22 16:41 ---
IIUC comment #8, this bug depends on bug 29336.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from carrot at google dot com 2009-05-05 15:32 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Sorry for my ignorance to gcc. What types of instructions reload will add?
> > Spilling and loading registers? and more?
> >
> That's pretty much it, but...
Before
--- Comment #9 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 10:06
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Sorry for my ignorance to gcc. What types of instructions reload will add?
> Spilling and loading registers? and more?
>
That's pretty much it, but...
> By reading the the implementatio
--- Comment #8 from carrot at google dot com 2009-05-04 10:08 ---
Sorry for my ignorance to gcc. What types of instructions reload will add?
Spilling and loading registers? and more?
By reading the the implementation of thumb_far_jump_used_p() I can get the
conclusion that if reload thi
--- Comment #7 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 09:41
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> We can compute the maximum possible function length first. If the length is
> not
> large enough far jump is not necessary, and we can do this optimization
> safely.
>
No, it's not th
--- Comment #6 from carrot at google dot com 2009-05-04 02:21 ---
We can compute the maximum possible function length first. If the length is not
large enough far jump is not necessary, and we can do this optimization safely.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38570
--- Comment #5 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 08:39 ---
*** Bug 39989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
11 matches
Mail list logo