--- Comment #14 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 16:44 ---
*** Bug 36851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 11:39 ---
Subject: Bug 38706
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jan 27 11:39:42 2009
New Revision: 143701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143701
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
Backport from mainline:
2009-01-13
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:58 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 21:56 ---
Subject: Bug 38706
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 7 21:56:32 2009
New Revision: 143167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143167
Log:
PR target/38706
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_end_
--- Comment #10 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 21:04
---
Your patch fixes the build and brings no regression in testsuite.
--
arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 13:05
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=17045)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17045&action=view) [edit]
> Patch to fix the failure
>
> We should not free cfun since it is neede
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 11:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=17045)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17045&action=view)
Patch to fix the failure
We should not free cfun since it is needed in alpha_end_function.
Arthur, can you perhaps b
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 08:04 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Current trunk bootstraps fine on an other machine, but the testcase fails too
> on it.
Thanks for the testcase, it fails on a crosscompiler too. I'll look into it.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot co
--- Comment #6 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 06:55
---
Current trunk bootstraps fine on an other machine, but the testcase fails too
on it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38706
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #5 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-04 04:16
---
Created an attachment (id=17028)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17028&action=view)
more reduced testcase
--
arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-04 03:49
---
Created an attachment (id=17027)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17027&action=view)
reduced testcase
Here is a first reduced testcase, with it I get:
$ ./gcc/cc1plus -quiet /tmp/bug.cc
/tmp
--- Comment #3 from arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com 2009-01-03 19:24
---
I tried again with trunk 143029, still on a clean build directory, and I get
the same failure, even with --disable-bootstrap. Hardware is an 21264C
(ev68cb), I'll try to make a reduced testcase and to build on a
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-03 16:58 ---
BTW: Did you build from a clean build directory?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38706
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-03 16:57 ---
Can you create a reduced testcase?
gcc bootstrapped OK a couple of days ago on alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu
(gcc30.fsffrance.org).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38706
15 matches
Mail list logo
