[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2010-05-04 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-05-04 08:55 --- Subject: Re: gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h" I regularly build all three combinations on mainline now: Sun as/ld, GNU as/Sun ld, and GNU as/ld, to make sure

[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2010-05-03 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-05-04 06:52 --- >> Rainer: Fixed for 4.5.0. Thanks to our Solaris Expert for fixing that. It is (was) great fun to have to build (at least we used to, "have to") gcc with both GNU's ld and Sun's to ensure there is (was) no breakage. Rec

[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2010-04-28 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 20:06 --- Fixed for 4.5.0. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2010-04-28 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 20:04 --- Mine. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do

[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2009-01-27 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-27 16:26 --- (In reply to comment #1) > With that dropped in gcc seems to build and test correctly. It _might_ be > that gcc builds Faster and uses Less memory during the two peaks in libjava > after this patch, more testing required.

[Bug target/38924] gcc 4.4.0 20090117 - init_priority incorrect for GNU ld in "gcc/config/sol2.h"

2009-01-21 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-22 01:47 --- With that dropped in gcc seems to build and test correctly. It _might_ be that gcc builds Faster and uses Less memory during the two peaks in libjava after this patch, more testing required. Rob -- http://gcc.gnu.org