--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-03 14:25 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00148.html patch posted.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-02-18 10:30 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.4 Regression] gcc_assert (verify_initial_elim_offsets
()); ICE
This is mostly likely due to my no micro code patch. I see what causes
it tommorow.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:55
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 12:28 ---
Yeah. Unlike anddi3_internal3_mc insn, anddi3_internal3_nomc only has an
alternative with t for the and64_2_operand that is not slightly disparaged
(?s), so for masks that match mask_operand or mask64_operand reload
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:34 ---
Hmm, for the PS3 toolchain, I think I just removed anddi3_internal3_mc.
Mine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:40 ---
You mean anddi3_internal3_nomc, right? If so, I guess anddi3_internal2_nomc
should be removed too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 19:41 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
You mean anddi3_internal3_nomc, right? If so, I guess anddi3_internal2_nomc
should be removed too.
I will have to look at what I did, I know I ran into a case where a constant
was being
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39226
