[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-17 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-17 09:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) It is if (TARGET_64BIT) { if (ix86_function_type_abi (type) == DEFAULT_ABI) return regparm; return DEFAULT_ABI != SYSV_ABI ? X86_64_REGPARM_MAX :

[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-17 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-17 12:55 --- Subject: Bug 39476 Author: hjl Date: Tue Mar 17 12:55:18 2009 New Revision: 144902 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=144902 Log: 2009-03-17 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR target/39476

[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-17 12:57 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-16 21:59 --- It is if (TARGET_64BIT) { if (ix86_function_type_abi (type) == DEFAULT_ABI) return regparm; return DEFAULT_ABI != SYSV_ABI ? X86_64_REGPARM_MAX : X64_REGPARM_MAX; } Shouldn't it be

[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-16 22:09 --- We never change regparm for 64bit. Does this patch Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c === --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 144817) +++

[Bug target/39476] Typo in ix86_function_regparm in i386.c

2009-03-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-17 01:24 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00761.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added