--- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-20 19:32 ---
Now Fixed . Yay.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 18:41 ---
Subject: Bug 40697
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Mar 19 18:41:22 2010
New Revision: 157582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=157582
Log:
gcc/
PR target/40697
* optabs.c
--- Comment #4 from bernds at codesourcery dot com 2010-03-16 10:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=20117)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20117action=view)
A patch to fix it.
The andsi3 expander has code to do the right thing, but
avoid_expensive_constant prevents it
--- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com 2009-07-09 09:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=18166)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18166action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40697
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 09:59 ---
Maybe we can fix this in expand instead: if we see (x CONST) and CONST is a
masking constant that isn't a legitimate constant for the the target, then see
if the sum of the rtx_cost of expressing the mask as shifts
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 10:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Maybe we can fix this in expand instead: if we see (x CONST) and CONST is a
masking constant that isn't a legitimate constant for the the target, then see
if the sum of the rtx_cost of
