--- Comment #4 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 14:01 ---
Indeed. SRA should not trigger here, that would make it too eager in other
cases (thus I'm removing myself from the CC, feel free to add me again if
there's any discussion that might concern me or SRA again).
--
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 07:16 ---
SRA expert - CC
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 09:07 ---
There is only one struct copy, so it isn't SRAs business to optimize anything
here. Instead the burden is put on expand and the backend to figure out the
most efficient way to do this block copy.
--
--- Comment #1 from wiml at dot org 2009-08-10 05:18 ---
Workaround notes:
Changing the structure assignment to multiple assignments, one for each field,
produces noticeably better code; and changing the argument list to pass the
structure fields individually produces code that
