--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 16:39 ---
Can you check if this problem is a regression from 4.2+? Although ICEs are not
welcomed, regression status would put more weight on the PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-10-01 19:43
---
No ICE with 4.3.3, either, but there is an ICE with
Target: ppc64-redhat-linux
gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-09-03 02:37
---
I thought Vlad's scheduling/register allocation patch here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg3.html
which solves PR24319, might fix this problem, but it does not.
--
--- Comment #1 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-08-27 00:14
---
Created an attachment (id=18431)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18431action=view)
preprocessed source file
I'm not having much luck cutting this down more, sorry.
--
