--- Comment #4 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 09:58
---
Subject: Bug 41302
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Wed Nov 4 09:57:55 2009
New Revision: 153890
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153890
Log:
2009-11-04 Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 11:47
---
Fixed.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-30 10:16
---
Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg01790.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41302
--- Comment #2 from dferbas at etech dot cz 2009-09-22 22:39 ---
We tried to modify the m68k variant of sibcall fn. But we have a problem with
compilation. Is there anyone who can test if following is OK ?
/* Implement TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL_P. We cannot use sibcalls
for
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 22:14 ---
This is almost certainly a bug in the m68k backend in that it
doesn't check for the difference in return registers. Compare
it's m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p function vs the i386 routine.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
