--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 17:34 ---
Subject: Bug 43708
Author: mrs
Date: Fri May 7 17:34:31 2010
New Revision: 159164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159164
Log:
PR target/43708
* config/darwin-c.c
--- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 17:35 ---
Thanks.
--
mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 15:08 ---
see :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00535.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43708
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43708
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-11 19:53 ---
TREE_USED is not redundant. The patch looks good to me, though I can't approve
it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43708
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 18:37 ---
Guess setting DECL_READ_P at the same spot as TREE_USED in config/darwin-c.c
could fix this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43708
--- Comment #2 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 19:24 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Guess setting DECL_READ_P at the same spot as TREE_USED in config/darwin-c.c
could fix this.
Yes, it does thanks the head up.
... is TREE_USED() redundant in this case?
(I've left it in
