[Bug target/44241] vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols

2011-06-27 Thread gingold at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44241 --- Comment #3 from gingold at gcc dot gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-27 12:51:14 UTC --- Author: gingold Date: Mon Jun 27 12:51:09 2011 New Revision: 175523 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175523 Log: 2011-06-27

[Bug target/44241] vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols

2011-06-27 Thread gingold at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44241 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/44241] vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols

2010-05-23 Thread jay dot krell at cornell dot edu
--- Comment #2 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-23 06:06 --- It also goes without saying that the factoring here stinks. At the very least, split the lists up into three: common 32 64 and then compose the result out of two of them. The prefixes can also probably

[Bug target/44241] vms-crtl.h, vms-crtl-64.h need many more symbols

2010-05-22 Thread jay dot krell at cornell dot edu
--- Comment #1 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-23 05:30 --- The line in the patch: DECC_(environ, decc$ga_environ) \ should be: DECC_(environ, ga_environ) \ obviously. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44241