http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-09
14:26:11 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 9 14:26:07 2010
New Revision: 165231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165231
Log:
PR target/45820
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-07
17:59:51 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Oct 7 17:59:30 2010
New Revision: 165128
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165128
Log:
PR target/45820
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-04
00:20:06 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 4 00:20:02 2010
New Revision: 164925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164925
Log:
PR target/45820
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02
17:20:26 UTC ---
Actually, the insn doesn't satisfy its constraints because %r31 should
be %r1. Have a patch. This is an old regression caused by a change to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45820
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02
17:38:38 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Oct 2 17:38:35 2010
New Revision: 164905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164905
Log:
PR target/45820
