http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #13 from Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail dot com 2011-07-09
20:55:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Since this is linker bug, I have added rth to CC in the hope that he has
better
solution.
Bug link is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattst88 at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-04-29 08:35:29
UTC ---
Unfortunately, the bootstrap on alphaev6-linux again fails with this message.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-04-29 14:01:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
FWIW, I've never gotten that linkage failure on my alphaev6-linux machine, and
last week's snapshots (4.7-20110423, 4.6-20110422, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-29
17:17:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
FWIW, I've never gotten that linkage failure on my alphaev6-linux machine,
and
last week's snapshots
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-04-29 17:52:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I do have quite an old binutils (2.18.50.0.9-8.fc10 20080822). I tried
binutils-2.21 once, but it regressed some gcc tls test so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.6.1
---
12 matches
Mail list logo