http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #17 from Michael Meissner
2011-03-31 18:43:44 UTC ---
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:43:05PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
>
> --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-31
18:38:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23841
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23841
Patch to fix the problem, originally from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-30 21:42:39 UTC ---
Test results with the patches in comment #5 and #6 posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02627.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-25 09:20:35 UTC ---
FWIW, my patch just fixed the expansion of commutative operations.
movmisalign and vector extractions are handled by two separate
pieces of code, so I don't think my pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24
20:09:06 UTC ---
My reading of the patches, is the rs6000 port was broken, and Andrew's two
patches fixes this.
Richard's patch would have the effect that we wouldn't notice if the two
patches are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-24 20:00:17 UTC ---
What about the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01595.html
? Does it come on top of the patches in comments #5 and #6 or does it replace
them?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24
19:44:12 UTC ---
I was wrong with my previous comment about movmisalign, and both patches look
good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner 2011-03-24
15:02:47 UTC ---
The vec_extract patches look good.
However, I think the movmisalign patch is a band-aid. The exander should call
force_reg if the predicates don't match for movmisalign (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-24
14:16:54 UTC ---
On powerpc-apple-darwin9, all the tests ran by vect.exp pass with the patches
in comments #5 and #6 on top of revision 171367.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48262
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
12 matches
Mail list logo
