[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 --- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-12 16:58:13 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Fri Aug 12 16:58:09 2011 New Revision: 177705 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177705 Log: Fix PR

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 --- Comment #1 from Carrot carrot at google dot com 2011-03-30 07:25:31 UTC --- Another possible enhancement is we can also use HImode jump table entries. Similar to cases min0, although tbh is not available in arm mode, we can use separate