http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-05 16:56:23 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jul 5 16:56:15 2012
New Revision: 189295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189295
Log:
Correct bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-22 14:16:34 UTC ---
There are still a few vmov's between Vector registers but I suspect that is
because of the vcombine at the end for which RichardE might have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24234|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Eric Batut eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27
16:20:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Any chance of seeing the work on this restart ?
I found this bug while looking for something that would help (I raised bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-24
11:00:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
How strongly do you object? I think the benefits are
worth any compatibility drawbacks in this case.
It would be a nice to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-02 13:40:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 24234 [details]
Proposed patch
The attached patch seems to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-16
08:13:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 24234 [details]
Proposed patch
The attached patch seems to fix the testcase and doesn't
regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-elf |arm-elf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-12 08:46:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 24234
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24234
Proposed patch
The attached patch seems to fix the testcase
14 matches
Mail list logo