http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-20
20:37:37 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Oct 20 20:37:32 2011
New Revision: 180271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180271
Log:
Fix operands order in BMI2 patterns.
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #6 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
13:09:30 UTC ---
Thread on gcc-patches ML:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01719.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #5 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:48:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hi,
> > this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
> > Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
>
> Please no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-19 09:46:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi,
> this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
> Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
Please note that gcc also supports Intel notatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #3 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:38:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 25553
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25553
Patch
I am testing it by now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:37:17 UTC ---
Hi,
this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
