http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #20 from Alan Modra 2011-12-06 03:47:40
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Dec 6 03:47:37 2011
New Revision: 182040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182040
Log:
PR target/50906
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra 2011-12-06 03:41:49
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Dec 6 03:41:44 2011
New Revision: 182039
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182039
Log:
PR target/50906
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #18 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-28
19:30:07 UTC ---
I am happy to report that your updated 4.6.2 patch seems to be 100% functional
on e500/SPE.
I get identical "test-summary" reports for patched-4.6.2 with and without
BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #17 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-22
18:50:20 UTC ---
Ok, a new kernel based on 3.2-rc1 resolved my crashing issues entirely. I
wasn't too worried about my DDR clocks since I have ECC memory and EDAC never
reported any errors.
Using the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
David Kühling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvdkhlng at gmx dot de
--- Comment #16 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #15 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-08
19:12:04 UTC ---
Sorry for the delay. I've suddenly started experiencing odd kernel panics on
my test boards in the middle of the test-suite runs and I'm in the process of
tracking them down. Based o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #14 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-04
21:20:18 UTC ---
I'm now rebuilding the Debian GCC 4.6.2-4 (which now includes the other 2
patches I mentioned previously) with the updated 4.6 patch, I'll let you know
what the results are (including
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25703|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25702|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #11 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-03
16:48:43 UTC ---
Ok, I'm running a "bootstrap-lean" + "make check" by way of a full Debian GCC
package build with this patch added. The first build will just do
C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++/Fortran; if that work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra 2011-11-03 12:59:10
UTC ---
Please test out these patches. bootstrap and regression tests with -Os in
BOOT_CFLAGS on spe would be ideal. I'll be running a powerpc-linux regression
test, but can't do that for spe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra 2011-11-03 12:55:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 25703
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25703
gcc-4.6 fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra 2011-11-03 12:54:32
UTC ---
Created attachment 25702
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25702
Proposed mainline fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #6 from Kyle Moffett 2011-11-02
18:24:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 25692
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25692
Archive of RTL dumps of failing testcase built with "-Os"
I spent some time looking through the RTL d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2011-11-02 00:05:42
UTC ---
bl _save64gpr_24
.loc 1 17 0
mr 31,4
.cfi_offset 31, -100
.cfi_offset 1231, -104
.cfi_offset 30, -108
.cfi_offset 1230, -112
.cfi_offset 29, -116
.cfi_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Moffett 2011-10-28
20:32:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 25652
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25652
Assembled unwindtestfunc.cc (with -Os)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Moffett 2011-10-28
20:31:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 25651
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25651
Assembled unwindtestfunc.cc (with -O2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906
--- Comment #1 from Kyle Moffett 2011-10-28
20:29:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25650
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25650
Test case, part 2
21 matches
Mail list logo
