http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
--- Comment #13 from eric.valette at free dot fr 2012-01-11 12:22:57 UTC ---
Even if the code is invalid, gcc should not crash with a ICE but notify that
the asm is invalid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
--- Comment #8 from eric.valette at free dot fr 2011-12-03 10:32:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I guess I've been hit by the Emit-conditions-in-push_multi problem. I applied
the patch below after verifying ist upstream but have not yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-12-03
20:45:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 25983
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25983
reduced test case in C
The big test case easily reduced to the following
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
--- Comment #10 from eric.valette at free dot fr 2011-12-03 23:49:42 UTC ---
Then at least I know how to fix the bug. Thanks a lot for your help. I will use
the C definition instead of inline asm. BTW I have no clue on arm assembler. Is
the asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
--- Comment #7 from eric.valette at free dot fr 2011-12-02 14:58:49 UTC ---
The line given in the error correspond to a gcc_unreachable call in the
fp_immediate_constant (rtx x) function???
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
