https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The other option is to change how intrinsics work on x86 and use resolve
> overloads inside the backend like how aarch64, arm and rs6000 backends all
> handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking at other intrinsics with {,unsigned }__int64{, const} * arguments, I
see
void _mm_maskstore_epi64 (__int64* mem_addr, __m128i mask, __m128i a)
void _mm256_maskstore_epi64 (__int64* mem_addr, __m256i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> BTW, to avoid that warning, you could use in C:
> extern __inline __m128i
> __attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |diagnostic, rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2012-05-22
08:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please provide a testcase to show the problem.
I have no idea, which kind of test it should be.
These is just MS-ICC-GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-22
11:52:12 UTC ---
BTW, to avoid that warning, you could use in C:
extern __inline __m128i
__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
_mm_i32gather_epi64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
