https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Mar 10 08:09:56 2015
New Revision: 221305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221305root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Mar 10 08:17:31 2015
New Revision: 221307
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221307root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Jan 19 22:35:53 2015
New Revision: 219864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219864root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Jan 14 23:46:34 2015
New Revision: 219623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219623root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-31 22:08:42
UTC ---
There was a typo in the PR number when committing the patch for this issue.
This is the original commit message that accidentally ended up in PR 54988:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-03 10:01:46
UTC ---
Omitting the sign/zero extensions is not safe for calculated QImode / HImode
values, only after the extending loads. However, I guess it would still be a