http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-17
11:25:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sounds more like a latent issue to me. Yes, removing invalid MEM_EXPRs would
be ok - but where do we dispatch to the tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-17
14:55:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 17 14:55:53 2012
New Revision: 194554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194554
Log:
2012-12-17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Bernhard Rosenkränzer Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
