http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #7 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com 2012-10-31
08:45:37 UTC ---
I think this is fixed and it's a bug in 4.8.0.
Hi Jack, could you verify that it is fixed? Thanks very much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30 02:17:57 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Oct 30 02:17:50 2012
New Revision: 192976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192976
Log:
PR target/54989
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-20
17:11:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The failure is caused by higher register pressure in the THEN branch of the
case, though I am not sure why the register
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-20
17:39:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
i can confirm that the proposed simplification of the test cases eliminates the
failures of hoist-register-pressure.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
