http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-18 15:11:38
UTC ---
This is what we changed in reload for stack realignment:
diff --git a/gcc/reload1.c b/gcc/reload1.c
index f28b01c..9b81062 100644
--- a/gcc/reload1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-12-18 19:42:59
UTC ---
LRA doesn't handle HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER at all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-17
21:39:28 UTC ---
If stack_realign_p is true, frame_pointer_needed is also true. So we can use
fp to eliminate frame but i386.c::x86_can_eliminate prohibits it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
