[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 --- Comment #2 from Adhemerval Zanella azanella at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- You are correct and I meant in my first comment QNaN for the NaN work. And I believe the patch is still correct: for IBM long double SNaN will be represented by first

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot