[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 Michael Barker mikeb01 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 Michael Barker mikeb01 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 --- Comment #5 from Michael Barker mikeb01 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @2.40GHz is not IvyBridge, plus even IvyBridge doesn't support lzcnt insn, only Haswell or some recent AMD

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 Julian Taylor jtaylor.debian at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 --- Comment #2 from Michael Barker mikeb01 at gmail dot com --- Hope helps What hardware platform are you testing on? I'm running on Ivy Bridge: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @2.40GHz Could you put the assembler that you see on the ticket: With

[Bug target/58928] Different results from gcc when -mlzcnt is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58928 chenjinzhi gnome3fans at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnome3fans at