[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-02-10 Thread bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #10 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: bviyer Date: Mon Feb 10 16:56:54 2014 New Revision: 207664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207664root=gccview=rev Log: Fix for PR target/59691. +2014-02-10 Balaji V. Iyer

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-02-10 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #6) Hi Jeff, Andrew and Bernd, Can you please try out the possible fix and see if that works for you? Thanks, Balaji V.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #5) Created attachment 31938 [details] Possible Fix. Possible fix. You can replace cpu_supports_sse with __builtin_cpu_supports since

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-25 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #9 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hi Bernd and H. J., The catch_exc.cc bug is a different issue. It is failing in most 32 bit machines and we are currently looking into it. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-23 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31938 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31938action=edit Possible Fix. Possible fix.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-23 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #6 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hi Jeff, Andrew and Bernd, Can you please try out the possible fix and see if that works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread bviyer at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com --- Hello Bernd, I don't have a pentium 2 machine readily available. Can you try this patch and see if it works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. diff --git

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #2) Hello Bernd, I don't have a pentium 2 machine readily available. Can you try this patch and see if it works for you? This is not

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-22 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- On 01/22/14 10:45, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

2014-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-*