https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:05:05 2019
New Revision: 277584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277584=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with relocations.
Darwin's linker doesn't like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Oct 28 19:40:03 2019
New Revision: 277540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277540=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with relocations.
Darwin's linker doesn't like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Oct 18 08:42:41 2019
New Revision: 277145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277145=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with relocations.
Darwin's linker doesn't like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Zaak from comment #18)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> > by the way, I haven't been able to find a C reproducer for this issue - if
> > you feel we should have a testcase for it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #18 from Zaak ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> by the way, I haven't been able to find a C reproducer for this issue - if
> you feel we should have a testcase for it perhaps a link test for the
> fortran example would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
by the way, I haven't been able to find a C reproducer for this issue - if you
feel we should have a testcase for it perhaps a link test for the fortran
example would work?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Oct 5 08:05:44 2019
New Revision: 276623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276623=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin] Amend section for constants with reloactions.
Darwin's linker doesn't like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
Zaak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #15 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Might this be related with PR63622 (and thus PR63580)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
do we have a revision # that triggered this behaviour?
(or has it always been there?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
do we have a revision # that triggered this behaviour?
(or has it always been there?)
Up to r189986 (2012-07-30) compiling the second code in comment 6 gives the
error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The change occurred at r190003 and an error
Error: TS 29113: Noninteroperable argument 'gee' to 'c_funloc' at (1)
is emitted if one uses -std=f2008.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
The change occurred at r190003 and an error
Error: TS 29113: Noninteroperable argument 'gee' to 'c_funloc' at (1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Let's work on the principle that the linker is DTRT (it seems reasonable, at
least).
---
So, I started to try and replicate what the failing case was doing with a c
equivalent.
My
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
As of now, I suspect that the placement into the .const section *might* be
fallout from the restrict markup.
To confirm
17 matches
Mail list logo
