http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri May 9 15:02:09 2014
New Revision: 210278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210278root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2014-05-08 Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu May 8 19:02:28 2014
New Revision: 210233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210233root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61092
* config/alpha/alpha.c: Include
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Jakub, what do you think about following c++ patch:
--cut here--
Index: semantics.c
===
--- semantics.c (revision 210137)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See the discussions, this is a step in a bad direction, the backend builtins
should be folded only during gimplification (i.e. the gimple_fold_builtin
targhook), unless folding them is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
IMHO fold_builtin should go away entirely in favor of gimple_fold_builtin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61092
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32757
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32757action=edit
Proposed patch that implements TARGET_GIMPLE_FOLD_BUILTIN for alpha
I am testing the
