https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Could this PR get some attention please? To have an idea about how fun it is,
look at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg01182.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
3.
Anyway, assuming that the intention is to unwrap the indirection from the call
- something like: ...
The following patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
This is a google branch rev.
211088 is OK the revision that triggers the fail is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot
