https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #19 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
This seems to have done the trick, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately, at the face of it, I think the only factors common with PR61844
are rot at the RTL level and building libgcc. (My own involvement with
SH64 is too far in the past
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #20)
Unfortunately, at the face of it, I think the only factors common with
PR61844 are rot at the RTL level and building libgcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #22 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
That's a shame. It's just that the error messages look very similar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jul 17 02:03:52 2014
New Revision: 212708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212708root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/61737.
* config/cris/cris.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jul 17 03:53:23 2014
New Revision: 212713
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212713root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk.
PR target/61737.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #10 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7)
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
I'm also very intrigued by that last line - I can reproduce it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #11 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
libgcc is built with:
make -C cris-linux-gnu tooldir=/usr all-target-libgcc
I'd expect make all-target-libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #12 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6)
Created attachment 33121 [details]
Patch to config.gcc
Correct patch to config.gcc required to actually build the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #12)
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6)
Created attachment 33121 [details]
Patch to config.gcc
Correct patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #10)
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7)
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
I'm also very intrigued
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #15 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #14)
Could you please consider open a separate PR for the is not reproducible
misdisagnosis?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #1)
Index: gcc/config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2014-7-15
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33121
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33121action=edit
Patch to config.gcc
Correct patch to config.gcc required to actually build the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
BTW,
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #0)
../../../gcc-4.9.0-20140702/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__subvsi3’:
../../../gcc-4.9.0-20140702/libgcc/libgcc2.c:122:1: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
This symbol_ref must be wrapped inside a CONST by the middle-end.
Uh, strike that, I'm hallucinating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
I needed the following change to gcc (courtesy of Nick Clifton) to get cris-gcc
to build at all, even without libgcc:
Index: gcc/config.gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61737
--- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com ---
This also appears to occur for --target=sh64-linux on an unpatched gcc tree.
23 matches
Mail list logo
