https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #23 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Mar 10 07:34:20 2015
New Revision: 221302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221302root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-10 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #21 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Wed Nov 19 14:40:26 2014
New Revision: 217780
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217780root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Adjust generic move costs
2014-11-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
--- Comment #20 from Evandro e.menezes at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #19)
To my mind it seems like 407 fmoves is just a bit too berserk and regardless
of how efficient your core is, there is no point in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[AArch64] High amounts of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED