https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.1.0, 6.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The tree level looks like this:
t_13 = VEC_COND_EXPR t_4 = { 4.142135679721832275390625e-1,
4.142135679721832275390625e-1, 4.142135679721832275390625e-1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch ---
I agree that the code produces correct results. It looks to me sub-optimal.
I understand that with Ofast the sequence below will be always executed
andps%xmm5,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ifcvt making a transformation that doesn't help vectorization and ends up
pessimizing the code... not really the first time this happens. I believe Jakub
had a big patch for that, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63599
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
