https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33793
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33793action=edit
Updated patch + regtest
Will check in after testing is over
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #6 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #5)
Created attachment 33793 [details]
Updated patch + regtest
Will check in after testing is over
Checked into main trunk (forgot to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33779
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33779action=edit
Patch is under testing now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I would have expected VI instead of IV in the iterator name, but I never
understood the rules for i?86 iterator names.
And, you want the testcase in the testsuite too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
I would have expected VI instead of IV in the iterator name, but I never
understood the rules for i?86 iterator names.
And, you want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63600
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
