https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #22 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #21)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> > > For the record with darwin15 I had to add
> > >
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #20)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> > For the record with darwin15 I had to add
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> For the record with darwin15 I had to add
>
> /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/
> NSEnumerator.h
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
For the record with darwin15 I had to add
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/NSEnumerator.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34310
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34310action=edit
Arrange for the instancetype type to be recognised
This makes instancetype a synonym for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the patch in comment 14, I get
=== obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes3073
# of unexpected failures13
# of expected failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear
interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this was a safe thing to do,
and might well be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #16)
We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear
interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
If I replace the files /usr/include/objc/NSObject.h and
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Headers/NSString.h with the
corresponding files from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Note that some remaining errors will go away if the same is used for
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Headers/NSArray.h.
This fixes the failures of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Regarding the last few comments: all this comes, AFAICT, from the front-end not
recognizing instancetype. I don't think we can get out of this by fixing
headers or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I agree, kludging around headers is not going to work - we need to find time to
modernise the ObjC implementation.
it's on the TODO…
Supporting ObjC on Darwin is quite important -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
(In reply to howarth from comment #7)
If I remember correctly, the blocks issue is problematic because of the
blocks runtime's license, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #2)
I suppose as a first approach, we could make it equivalent to id.
Not really, apparently: the answer there gives a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
Does it means that 'id' should be replaced with 'instancetype' in failing
tests? What about the gnu-runtime?
No, we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4)
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
Does it means that 'id' should be replaced with 'instancetype' in failing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4)
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
Does it means that 'id' should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #7 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4)
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
Does it means that 'id' should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #1)
I suppose as a first approach, we could make it equivalent to id.
Not really, apparently: the answer there gives
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
23 matches
Mail list logo
