[Bug target/64897] Floating-point "and" not optimized on x86-64

2021-11-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/64897] Floating-point "and" not optimized on x86-64

2021-11-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Since GCC 9 we get for fand1: movq%xmm0, %rax btrq$63, %rax movq%rax, %xmm0 ret The question comes does the movement between sse registers and gprs is cheaper than

[Bug target/64897] Floating-point "and" not optimized on x86-64

2015-02-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|