https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
I would say so. OP may reopen if he can reproduce on 5.2 or later. Almost
certainly a dup.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is most likely fixed for 5.2 also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> This is most likely fixed for 5.2 also.
See PR 65408.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64, ppc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
> Andrew,
>
> Did you manage to reproduce this on aarch64 or did you really mean ppc64 in
> target ?
I most likely just meant ppc64 (I had aarch64 on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096
Chris karlowatz_chris at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|