[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2019-06-17 Thread maskray at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maskray at google dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2016-07-02 Thread jb999 at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #12 from jb999 at gmx dot de --- Yes, that's why I'm using binutils 2.25.1 to link firefox. I was just wondering whether binutils >= 2.26 and gcc 4.9.3 might cause harm. >From what I understand will binutils >= 2.26 with gcc 4.9.3 al

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2016-07-01 Thread nix at esperi dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #11 from Nix --- The symptoms are failures to link with "relocation against protected symbol is invalid" errors which go away when you use gold. (You can see it if you try to build firefox, for instance.)

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2016-07-01 Thread jb999 at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #10 from jb999 at gmx dot de --- Could someone please explain what this means for binutils >= 2.26 and gcc 4.9.3?

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2016-06-18 Thread nix at esperi dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 Nix changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nix at esperi dot org.uk --- Comment #9 from Nix

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2016-04-01 Thread jb999 at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 jb999 at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb999 at gmx dot de --- Comment #8

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2015-05-28 Thread raj.khem at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 Khem Raj changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2015-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2015-03-27 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Mar 27 18:11:00 2015 New Revision: 221742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221742&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add default_binds_local_p_2 and use it for x86 Protected data symb

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2015-03-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #4 from H

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

2015-03-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- BInutils, glibc and GCC patches are posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00257.html